Tuesday, October 13, 2009

S.I.S., FNF, public morality and The Syariah Law

Bismillahirrahmaanirraheem

The liberalist agenda of Sisters-In-Islam (SIS), has, of late, been noted by many organisations in Malaysia.
Note a forum (in April 2005) - part of Zainah Anwar's paper (entitled "Enforcing Public morality") below- being organised by Friederich Naumann Foundation (FNF). More about FNF in the last section of this blog.

SIS was listed as SIS Forum (Malaysia) Berhad in SSM but not registered in ROS.


This paper was presented by Zainah Anwar, Executive Director of SIS
at the Public Forum organised by Liberal Forum Malaysia and Friederich Naumann Foundation, Kuala Lumpur, 27 April 2005.
(part of paper)
1."Public morality must depend on public consensus. For example, there is public consensus that sex in public constitutes immoral behaviour. Hence such behaviour is criminalised by the state as a display of public indecency.

2. If there is no public consensus, public morality laws become unenforceable. Look at Iran after 25 years of Islamic rule. Look at Afghanistan under Taliban rule. In spite of the moral policing in the streets, in the offices, in the neighbourhoods, on the university campuses, the moral laws imposed by the state have failed to bring about a more pious, moral and obedient ummah. At best, the laws can command outward conformity to moral rules; but in the end they hinder the very moral education they were designed to assist.

3. Women were forced to wear the hijab, without fully understanding or imbibing the reasons for it. The streets of Tehran today are filled with young women displaying far more hair than hijab because 25 years of compulsory hijab law have only brought about defiance, not compliance. The question this raises is: would it have been more effective to educate young people to be able to freely choose to do the morally right thing for the right reason, and not because of the fear of the coercive power of the state.

4. To this day, the record of enforcement raises doubt as to whether such a ( Syariah) law can indeed ensure that Muslims lead a life according to the teachings of their religion.

5."Can we not be a good Muslim without Big Brother watching over our shoulder with every step we take, ready to send us to jail, fine us or whip us should we transgress?"

6.What are the implications to democratic governance, to multi-racial Malaysia, if only a small group of people, the ulama, as traditionally believed, have the right to interpret the Qur'an...."

(from website of SISTERS-IN-ISLAM; http://www.sistersinislam.org.my/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=515&Itemid=209).

An Interview with the International Herald Tribune, 2006 with Zainah Anwar:
‘‘With the acid touch that has made her an accomplished campaigner, Zainah Anwar calls the officials in the government religious departments ‘those Taliban-minded bureaucrats.’’
( http://www.firdaus.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=423 )

FRIEDERICH NAUMANN FOUNDATION (FNF) : What is it?
The Foundation follows the ideals of the protestant theologian, Friedrich Naumann. At the beginning of the last century, Naumann was a leading German liberal thinker and politician. In this regard, the Foundation is an agent of organized liberalism. It promotes this through civic education, international political dialogues, and political counselling. The Foundation has numerous offices in Europe, Africa, America and Asia.

FNF works with the American Jewish Committee in organizing events and hosting each others' researchers/operatives.
http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Friedrich_Naumann_Foundation
http://www.fnf.org.ph/aboutus.htm
http://www.fnf.org.ph/

FNF has maintained good relations with ex-DPM Anwar Ibrahim despite the latter having been sacked from the government for sexual misconduct and corruption. The agenda is obvious: promote Liberal Islam through Anwar, and confuse the Muslim masses throughout Asia and Middle East. His roadshow talks through these regions are well known.
http://din.huluselangor.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=777

These extensive evil webs stretch out to many nations, via "workshops, forum, lectures, seminars" conducted by various foreign agencies interconnected with one another ( NED, FNF, IRI, NDI, CFR, AIPAC, AJC to name a few) and have ONE aim: anti-Islam and anti-Christ, to weaken the fundamentals and faith of the followers of both religions; and ensuring the survival and expansion of Zionist-Israel.

Monday, October 12, 2009

NED Dan Penglibatan Licik nya di negara-negara

1. NED ialah National Endowment For Democracy, iaitu organisasi muka hadapan CIA (Central Intelligence Agency)
(Beberapa informasi berikut diambil dari artikel Saudara Faisal Tehrani )

2. Penubuhan NED sejak 1980 adalah untuk “membantu usaha demokrasi di negara yang dipercayai dapat memberi manfaat kepada Amerika Syarikat,



3. NED menyalurkan dana secara terus atau melalui badan lain terutama Institut Demokratik Nasional (National Democratic Institute, NDI) dan Institut Republikan Antarabangsa (International Republican Institute, IRI), yang aktif di banyak negara termasuk Malaysia.



4.
NED melakukan kerja batu api dengan memprovokasi aktiviti kepembangkangan. Apabila pembangkang menjadi kuat dan provokatif, pihak kerajaan akan mengambil tindakan keras terhadap pembangkang dan ini akan membolehkan kepercayaan sebahagian besar rakyat terhadap kerajaan yang telah dipilih menerusi cara demokrasi tergugat .

5.
Media Barat akan membantu usaha ini (menjatuhkan parti yang memerintah) dengan meuar-uarkan analisis, pungutan suara rawak, dan pelbagai berita bahawa parti-parti pembangkang akan menumpaskan parti kerajaan dan apabila pembangkang gagal dalam pilihan raya tersebut, parti-parti yang didanai NED telah turun ke jalan raya untuk melakukan protes.

6. Kaedah lain menggugat keamanan negara ialah menyatukan beberapa parti pembangkang berlainan ideologi di bawah satu payung. Gabungan pembangkang ini akan didanai menerusi seorang tokoh yang dikenal pasti dengan harapan dapat menjatuhkan kerajaan yang sedia ada.

7. “Media training workshop” (untuk pemimpin/ tokoh/ parti pembangkang/ NGO/ media, kononnya untuk melatih peserta mewakili masyarakat dalam bidang komunikasi awam.

8.. NED memberi dana yang amat besar kepada persatuan dan badan-badan se sebuah negara, melalui organisasi-organisasi atau sesi latihan di bawah naungannya, untuk mencapai matlamat globalnya. Contohnya,
i. Yayasan Abdorrahman Boroumand, ABF, (Iran)
ii.
Majlis Iran Amerika Nasional (NIAC),(Iran)
iii. BERSIH (Malaysia) ;
http://www.ndi.org/malaysia?page=0,1#Funding.)
iv. Bengkel dan workshop parti-parti politik Malaysia, di kendalikan oleh NDI.
http://www.iri.org/asia/malaysia/2006-08-06-Malaysia.asp.
iv. Merdeka Centre (Malaysia); Dana IRI. (
http://www.merdeka.org/pages/08_links.html.)
v. Malaysiakini (Malaysian portal media);
(http://cima.ned.org/868/malysia-event.html)



Artikel sepenuhnya (http://tehranifaisal.blogspot.com/2009/07/artikel-penuh-ned-dan-campurtangan.html ).

Obama and the Nobel Peace Prize propaganda

1. The threat to humanity and world peace is THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ISRAEL and NATO.

2. Not Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, China nor Russia.

3. The following information is taken from Prof. Chossudovsky's article in an online journal, globalresearch.ca


i. "We are (at) the crossroads of the most serious crisis in modern history. The US in partnership with NATO and Israel has launched a global military adventure which, in a very real sense, threatens the future of humanity.

ii. Granting the Nobel Peace Prize to Barack Obama provides legitimacy to the illegal practices of war, to the military occupation of foreign lands, to the relentless killings of civilians in the name of "democracy".

iiii. Both the Obama administration and NATO are directly threatening Russia, China and Iran. The US under Obama is developing "a First Strike Global Missile Shield System".

iv. The granting of the Nobel "peace prize" to president Barack Obama has become an integral part of the Pentagon's propaganda machine.

v. It provides a human face to the invaders, it upholds the demonization of those who oppose US military intervention.

vi. The decision to grant Obama the Nobel Peace Prize was no doubt carefully negotiated with the Norwegian Committee at the highest levels of the US government. It has far reaching implications.

vii. It unequivocally upholds the US led war as a "Just Cause". It erases the war crimes committed both by the Bush and Obama administrations.

War Propaganda: Jus ad Bellum

viii. The "Just war" theory serves to camouflage the nature of US foreign policy, while providing a human face to the invaders.

ix. In both its classical and contemporary versions, the Just war theory upholds war as a "humanitarian operation". It calls for military intervention on ethical and moral grounds against "insurgents", "terrorists", "failed" or "rogue states".

x. The Just War has been heralded by the Nobel Committee as an instrument of Peace. Obama personifies the "Just War".

xi. Taught in US military academies, a modern-day version of the "Just War" theory has been embodied into US military doctrine. The "war on terrorism" and the notion of "preemption" are predicated on the right to "self defense." They define "when it is permissible to wage war": jus ad bellum. "

Author: Prof. Michel Chossudovsky

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15622