Petronas : Has anybody noticed anything about the GLC Management

Do you see what I see?

Read this article I came across today.

http://malaydelima.blogspot.com/2012/09/dap-cuba-rampas-petronas.html

1."Ramai rakan-rakan yang berada dalam industri minyak dan gas, yang berasa sangat pelik, hairan, khuatir dan risau dengan perkembangan terkini yang berlaku dalam Petronas. Mereka kata, kalau sebelum ini, mereka hanya bertemu dengan kalangan profesional berintegriti tinggi, mempunyai semangat nasionalisme yang utuh – nampaknya trend ini semakin berubah. 

2.Sudah ada perkembangan yang sangat tidak positif berlaku di dalam Petronas.

3.Petronas hebat selama ini dengan usaha, komitmen, kerja keras dan semangat nasionalisme pekerja Petronas sendiri. Mereka jatuh dan bangun dengan Petronas. 

4.Setia dengan syarikat itu walaupun mendapat tawaran berpuluh kali ganda daripada syarikat utama dunia yang lain.

5. Sayangnya, satu demi satu, individu dan ‘kroni’ seorang pemimpin kanan Petronas dibawa masuk tanpa sebarang tugasan yang spesifik.

6. Main bawa masuk kawan sahaja?

7. Ada kalangan mereka yang baru dilantik dibayar dengan harga puluhan ribu USD – dan hanya memainkan peranan sebagai Advisor!!!"         -end of quote-

Jom read the full article. 

Kita harus  imbas semula siapa yang mengambil inisiatif untuk mewujudkan government-linked company (GLC); dan apa tujuan asal adanya GLC di Malaysia.

Pada fahaman saya yang cetek, GLC asalnya disyorkan oleh Pertubuhan Kebangsaan Melayu Bersatu, bagi menaikkan taraf ekonomi kaum Bumiputera yang amat tertinggal ke belakang (economically disadvantaged) di Tanah Air sendiri, di dalam sektor kewangan dan ekonomi, berbanding kaum Cina yang monopoli ekonomi sejak kurun lepas, 1800an lagi, apabila mereka merantau ke rantau ini.

Harap pucuk Pimpinan negara.. DO SOMETHING

Penang :The Penangite citizens suffer in silence

Penang's Opposition-ruled government is not what you think it portrays itself to be.

Ask the man in the street.

Watch this video..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLDFWsli4_M&feature=player_embedded#t=78s

taken from muststopthis BLOG.


http://muststopthis.blogspot.com/2012/07/what-happens-when-you-complaint-about.html

Dear Penangites, do write in to me and tell your side of the story.

Chris Stevens and American Hegemony in Middle East

http://www.anwaraidc.com/?p=27605


1. "America’s “democracy promotion” is simply a rhetorical mechanism within which hegemonic ambitions are couched. US State Department fronts, including Freedom House and the National Endowment for Democracy have their boards of directors full of Neo-Conservative warmongers and representatives of corporate-financier interests. They use issues of “democracy” and “human rights” to dress up naked military aggression and global corporate-financier expansion.

2. Despite a concerted effort by Western media houses to portray Libya as in the hands of progressive democratic secularists, the country was intentionally handed over to extremists to serve as a base of militancy to destabilize and destroy targets of Western interest around the word. 

3. The men (John) McCain was defending were Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) militants, terrorists linked directly with Al Qaeda according to West Point reports (.pdf), and listed to this day by the US State Department, the UK Home Office (.pdf), and the UN as a “foreign terrorist organization.”

4. These same terrorists are now not only the defacto rulers of much of Libya,  but are leading death squads in Syria .

5.Starting in March 2011, US President Barack Obama appointed Christopher Stevens as “Special Representative to the Libyan Transitional National Council,” and sent him to Benghazi to coordinate US military, diplomatic, and financial support to a “counter government” constituted from Cyrenaica’s Al Qaeda terror battalions and a cadre of US-educated, politically cultivated proxies across the “National Transitional Council” (NTC).

6. Eventually, Stevens’ mission would become a success. NATO-backed terrorists overran the Libyan government, overthrowing it in Tripoli.

7. He played a leading role in coordinating the violent subversion of Libya by listed terrorist organizations before being named “US Ambassador” to Libya. 

8. Recent attacks on US embassies were designed to give “street credit” to sectarian extremists who are increasingly seen internationally as mercenary proxies of US-Saudi-Israeli foreign policy – Stevens’ death was most likely an accident. 

9.  In all likelihood, those behind the attacks on the embassies intended the violence to be limited in scope, and without any high-profile deaths – designed simply to lend sorely lacking legitimacy to America’s growing list of client-states. Ambassador Stevens apparently was caught in smoke while escaping from the US consulate in Benghazi, and died of asphyxiation – a victim of unforeseen circumstances, not the victim of a targeted assassination.